MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7097316861

Melting history and magmatic evolution of basalts and picrites from the accreted Wrangellia oceanic

2009· article· en· W7097316861 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological and Geochemical Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBasaltSubaerialFlood basaltPillow lavaVolcanoBrecciaSeamountVolcanic plateauSedimentary rockMantle plume
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The accretedWrangellia oceanic plateau in the Pacific Northwest of North America provides important insights into the volcanic archi-tecture of major oceanic plateaus, as well as the nature of their mantle source, conditions of melting and subsequent magmatic evolu-tion. The 20 000 km2 Karmutsen Formation flood basalts (Vancouver Island) were emplaced at c. 225^230 Ma onto Middle Triassic marine sediments and Late Devonian to Early Permian island-arc volcanic and sedimentary sequences, and are overlain by LateTriassic platformal carbonates.The basalts form an emergent sequence consisting of a basal sediment^sill complex (600^900 m thick), pillowed and massive submarine flows (425 km), pillow breccia and hyaloclastite (515 km), and massive subaerial flows (525 km). Although the Karmutsen Formation is predominantly composed of tholeiitic basalt, the submarine part of the stratigraphy on northern Vancouver Island also contains picritic basalts. These

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.059
Threshold uncertainty score0.117

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.166
Teacher spread0.156 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicGeological and Geochemical Analysis→French-language works237,207→