Bibliographic record
Abstract
Due to the revision of the Montreal Protocol (Copenhagen- November 1992), CFCs will be phased out at the end of 1995. The European Union (EU) has adopted a more severe position and will ban CFCs by the end of 1994. In order to face this challenge, Elf Atochem has developed a comprehensive range of CFC alternatives. Today, CFC-12 can easil be replaced by the FORANEQ 134a or the FORANEQ FX56 (retrofit) and R-502 by the FORANE 8 FX70 or the FORANEB FXlO (retrofit). During the last two years, Elf Atochem's new FORANE @ refrigerants have been intensively tested in the field, first, by compressor manufacturers, second, by equipment manufacturers and contractors. FORANEB blends are today recognized by major compressor manufacturers and are requested by major supermarket chains for retrofits. Large number of retrofits have been performed on various systems through a wide range of technology all over the world. This paper puts forwards a selection of representative experiences where Elf Atochem brought technical assistance and follow-up, in order to assess FORANE @ products performance. Upon these experiences, it appears that data and observations reported by contractors indicate that
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".