Although this program should run on Windows NT and 2000, these operating systems may have real time issues which have not been explored to this author's satisfaction.
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Presented in this paper is a real-time, object-oriented solution for programming experimental software on the Windows 9x 1 platform. Every attempt is taken to maximize the strengths (32 bit graphics, hardware acceleration) and minimize the weaknesses (OS and Input timing uncertainties) inherent with this operating system. Analysis is presented which clearly shows the capability of this system for real time studies, as well as the problems in assuming that Windows will do this for you. Sample code is presented on how to implement these ideas using C++ as the programming language and OpenGL for the graphics library. This research was partially funded by an NSERC post graduate scholarship with a Canadian Space Agency Supplement. Address correspondence to the author at: Department of Psychology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, N.S. Canada. B3H 4J1. Email macinnwj@cs.dal.ca Sample code can be downloaded at http://or.psychology.dal.ca/~joe/downloads/ My thanks to Patricia McMullen, Ray...
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it