Bibliographic record
Abstract
The purpose of this paper is to study the lives of women in the late eighteen hundreds to early nineteen hundreds living on the Canadian prairies. First-hand accounts that document the day-to-day experiences of pioneer women will be used to provide insight into how these women responded to their new environment, dealt with the trials and tribulations they encountered, and resolved the psychological and physical emotions their experiences evoked. Pioneer women faced many obstacles in the new land, but showed themselves to be resourceful people and good partners to their husbands. Pioneer women shared the workload on the homestead. They endured many hardships such as poverty, loneliness, sickness, and danger, in most cases overcoming all obstacles. At times they took full responsibility for the homestead, family and livestock. As they worked through these difficult years they began to see that though they contributed equally to whatever venture husband and wife were involved in, they were not considered equals in either culture or law. With that realization pioneer women took on a new task fighting for and achieving equal rights for women. Primary sources used are taken from the following writings: The Silence of the
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.050 | 0.012 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.012 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".