Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
al a ine im cies that do not live in groups. We used a simulation model to investigate the influence of conspecifics, as both competitors and providers of social information, on the optimal sampling behaviour of nongroup animals therefore spend time reducing uncertainty about their environment by gathering information (Dall et al. to recognize subtypes; Stephens 1987). Such sampling anges state (Stephens 1987). For patches that change state by renewing and depleting, the optimal sampling rate (1) increases strongly with renewal frequency and the rate little research has considered sampling behaviour from ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR, 20 doi:10.1016/j.anbehaMcGill School of Environment, 3534 University, Room 20, Montreal,of other group members and sample less often than if they were alone. Competition and social information can also be important for animals that do not forage in groups if they encounter conspecifics at food patches. Spe-cies with this type of interaction are common (e.g. many fishes, seabirds and small mammals), but the dynamics
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it