MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7097437303

GRABEN STRUCTURE IN THE COEUR D'ALENE DISTRICT

2016· article· en· W7097437303 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological formations and processes
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSlumpingAnticlineGrabenPrecambrianRiftBrecciaRift valley
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Information published in U.S.G.S. Professional Papers 445 and 478 indicated to the writer that the structure of the Coeur d'Alene District in northern Idaho were developed by slumping along a rift graben that formed during late Precambrian time while the sediments were more or less semi-consolidated. Deep synclinal folds with adjacent anticlines over-turned toward each other, minor slump features, the St. Regis Breccia resembling a "quickstone breccia " and abundant evidence of past hydro-thermal activity all seem to support the theory of an ancient rift graben. THE locally intense folding and faulting in the Coeur d'Alene District of northern Idaho according to Hobbs and others (7) was developed as a result of local rotational stresses. The regional deformation of the Belt Series throughout Southeastern British Columbia, Southwestern Alberta, Western Montana, Northern Idaho, and Eastern Washington is mild; the rocks being nearly flat lying or rarely having a dip of greater than 50 ø. The intense

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.119
Threshold uncertainty score0.236

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.058
GPT teacher head0.259
Teacher spread0.202 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicGeological formations and processes→French-language works237,207→