Firearms – Mandatory Minimum Sentences – Consecutive Sentences – Notice of Greater Penalty
Bibliographic record
Abstract
POLICY Firearms offences under the Criminal Code are serious and pose a substantial threat to public safety. The paramount concern is the protection of the public. The Supreme Court of Canada has stated: Criminal conduct involving the use of firearms, especially handguns, is a serious and growing societal danger. … The risk posed to the community by those in possession of handguns gives an added significance to police efforts to seize those weapons and apprehend those in possession of them … (R. v. Clayton and Farmer This policy contains a number of important guidelines which are intended to enhance public safety. Any decision under this policy based on exceptional circumstances must first be approved by Regional or Deputy Regional Crown Counsel. The reasons for the decision must be recorded on the file. [2007] S.C.J. No. 32 at paragraph 36) Except in Exceptional Circumstances, when the evidentiary test under policy CHA1 is met
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.006 | 0.027 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.013 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.091 | 0.058 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".