MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7097495227

The Use of Internal and External Functional Domains to Improve Transmembrane Protein Topology Prediction

2008· article· en· W7097495227 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicMachine Learning in Bioinformatics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTransmembrane proteinTransmembrane domainMembrane topologyTopology (electrical circuits)Domain (mathematical analysis)Membrane proteinProtein structure
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

I hereby declare that I am the sole author of this thesis. This is a true copy of the thesis, including any required final revisions, as accepted by my examiners. I understand that my thesis may be made electronically available to the public. ii Membrane proteins are involved in vital cellular functions and have important implications in disease processes, drug design and therapy. However, it is difficult to obtain diffraction quality crystals to study transmembrane protein structure. Transmembrane protein topology prediction tools try to fill in the gap between abundant number of transmembrane proteins and scarce number of known membrane protein structures (3D structure and biochemically characterized topology). However, at present, the prediction accuracy is still far from perfect. TMHMM is the current state-of-the-art method for membrane protein topology prediction. In order to improve the prediction accuracy of TMHMM, based upon the method of GenomeScan, the author implemented AHMM (augmented HMM) by incorporating functional domain information externally to TMHMM. Results show that AHMM is better than TMHMM on both helix and sidedness prediction. This improvement is verified by both statistical tests as well as sensitivity and specificity studies. It is expected that when more and more functional domain predictors are available, the prediction accuracy will be further improved. iii Acknowledgements The research is supervised by Dr. Paul Kearney along with help from Dr. Daniel G. Brown in an early course project. My readers are Dr. Daniel G. Brown and Dr. Ming Li. I would also like to thank my colleagues Ms. Brona Brejova, Mr. John Tsang and Mr. Mike Hu from the University of Waterloo, Dr. Peter Ehlers and Dr. Andrei Turinsky from the University of Calgary for their helpful discussions and Dr. Michel Dominguez from Caprion for his opinion on functional domain sidedness. This thesis is dedicated to God for His love, mercy and grace. iv

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.312
Threshold uncertainty score0.212

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.225
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMachine Learning in BioinformaticsFrench-language works237,207