MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7097495227

The Use of Internal and External Functional Domains to Improve Transmembrane Protein Topology Prediction

2008· article· en· W7097495227 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicMachine Learning in Bioinformatics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTransmembrane proteinTransmembrane domainMembrane topologyTopology (electrical circuits)Domain (mathematical analysis)Membrane proteinProtein structure
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

I hereby declare that I am the sole author of this thesis. This is a true copy of the thesis, including any required final revisions, as accepted by my examiners. I understand that my thesis may be made electronically available to the public. ii Membrane proteins are involved in vital cellular functions and have important implications in disease processes, drug design and therapy. However, it is difficult to obtain diffraction quality crystals to study transmembrane protein structure. Transmembrane protein topology prediction tools try to fill in the gap between abundant number of transmembrane proteins and scarce number of known membrane protein structures (3D structure and biochemically characterized topology). However, at present, the prediction accuracy is still far from perfect. TMHMM is the current state-of-the-art method for membrane protein topology prediction. In order to improve the prediction accuracy of TMHMM, based upon the method of GenomeScan, the author implemented AHMM (augmented HMM) by incorporating functional domain information externally to TMHMM. Results show that AHMM is better than TMHMM on both helix and sidedness prediction. This improvement is verified by both statistical tests as well as sensitivity and specificity studies. It is expected that when more and more functional domain predictors are available, the prediction accuracy will be further improved. iii Acknowledgements The research is supervised by Dr. Paul Kearney along with help from Dr. Daniel G. Brown in an early course project. My readers are Dr. Daniel G. Brown and Dr. Ming Li. I would also like to thank my colleagues Ms. Brona Brejova, Mr. John Tsang and Mr. Mike Hu from the University of Waterloo, Dr. Peter Ehlers and Dr. Andrei Turinsky from the University of Calgary for their helpful discussions and Dr. Michel Dominguez from Caprion for his opinion on functional domain sidedness. This thesis is dedicated to God for His love, mercy and grace. iv

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.225
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMachine Learning in BioinformaticsFrench-language works237,207