Utricularia gibba L. humped bladderwort Lentibulariaceae (Bladderwort Family) Utricularia gibba humped bladderwort
Bibliographic record
Abstract
roots. The stems are very slender and up to 10 in. (25 cm) long. They may be floating, submerged or creeping along the bottom. The stem leaves are alternate, numerous, and 1/8 to 3/8 in. (3-10 mm) long. They are threadlike, have hairless margins, and may be undivided or generally 2-parted at the base and each part may be forked again. There are 1 or 2 valve-lidded bladders borne on the leaves that are less than 1/16 in. (1-2 mm) wide,which trap small invertebrates. This species has no winter buds. The inflorescence has 1 to 4 yellow flowers to 5/16 in. (6-8 mm) long at the end of a stalk less than 6 in. (15 cm) long. The flowers are strongly irregular. The lower lips are broad, flat, and saddle shaped. The flower spurs are broadly coneshaped, but shorter than the lower lips. The fruit capsules are borne on erect stalks, and the seeds are winged. Identification Tips: Other bladderworts that occur in the same counties in Washington as Utricularia gibba include U. inflata, U. intermedia, U. macrorhiza, U. minor, and U. ochroleuca. U. minor and U. gibba are the only species of this genus to have glabrous leaf margins, but U. gibba has winged seeds while U. minor does not. U. gibba differs from all these species in that it has no winter buds in its leaf axils, which are the most common propagation method for other species of Utricularia. Phenology: This species flowers from June through August. Range: This species is known from southern British Columbia south to California. It is also known from eastern North America from Quebec south to Florida and Louisiana, Central America, and the West Indies. In Washington, this species has been observed in Kitsap, Thurston, and Cowlitz counties. It was historically found in King County, but is believed to be extirpated there.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.010 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".