MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7097537587

An Upper Bound on the Least Inert Prime in a Real Quadratic Field

2007· article· en· W7097537587 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicAnalytic Number Theory Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsKronecker deltaDiscriminantPrime (order theory)Legendre symbolField (mathematics)Quadratic residueSymbol (formal)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

It is shown by a combination of analytic and computational techniques that for any positive fundamental discriminant D ? 3705, there is always at least one prime p ! p D=2 such that the Kronecker symbol (D=p) = \\Gamma1. 1991 Mathematics Subject Classification 11R11, 11Y40 The first author is a Presidential Faculty Fellow. His research is partiallly supported by the NSF. The research of the second two authors is partially supported by NSERC of Canada 1 1 Introduction Let D be the fundamental discriminant of a real quadratic field and let S = f5; 8; 12; 13; 17; 24; 28; 33; 40; 57; 60; 73; 76; 88; 97; 105; 124; 129; 136; 145; 156; 184; 204; 249; 280; 316; 345; 364; 385; 424; 456; 520; 609; 616; 924; 940; 984; 1065; 1596; 2044; 2244; 3705g: At the end of Chapter 6 of [5], the second author made the following conjecture. Conjecture. The values of D for which the least prime p such that the Kronecker symbol (D=p) = \\Gamma1 satisfies p ? p D=2 are precisely those in S. He also veri...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.018
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.037

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.018
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.006
Scholarly communication0.0050.009
Open science0.0020.004
Research integrity0.0020.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0110.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.077
GPT teacher head0.402
Teacher spread0.325 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAnalytic Number Theory ResearchFrench-language works237,207