Table 1. Pre-causeway fish species list.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Petitcodiac River Causeway, constructed in 1968 as a transportation link between Moncton and Riverview, New Brunswick, forms aphysical barrier to fish migrating between marinc and freshwater portions of the river system. Over half tlie fish species formerly recorded from tlie freshwater portion of the river are diadromous, and most have been adversely affected by the causeway, which blocks the estuary about 24 krn below the fomier head of tide. Prominent species that havc been reduced or eliminated irom the system include Atlantic salmon (partoftlie genetically distinct Inner Bay of Fu~idy stock), sea-nin brook trout, American shad, striped bass and rainbotv smelt. Over the past three decades, operating procedures of the control gates and the configuration of tile vertical-slot fishway have bee11 modified several times in attempts to improve fish passage. Eventually, gate operating procedures ofthe 1980s and 1990s will be statistically analysed using the gale operator's logbook data in order to evaluate the historical fish passage opportunities of all diadromous species recorded from the system. I-fere, I review some rclevalit history. What species require passage? Diadronious species require migration between freshwater rivers such as tliose in tile Petitcodiac system atximarine witers such as the Bay ofFundy to coinplete their life cycles. 111 order to enter or leave the fresh waters of the Petitcodiac, diadromous species must transit the area where the causeway is now located. Diadro~nous taxa clearly dominated the ecology and fisheries of tlie Petitcodiac, in the days before the causeway (Table 1).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.005 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.405 | 0.239 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; the direct Gemma label and the distilled Codex classifier agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".