Chlorinated Solvent Source and Plume Behavior in Fractured Sedimentary Rock from Field Studies (former title) Investigating Contaminated Sites on Fractured Rock Using the DFN Approach
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This presentation provides an overview of a major field- focused program of studies aimed at improved investigation methods and understanding organic contaminant source zones and plumes in fractured porous sedimentary rock. This research began in 1997, when intensive field studies were initiated at a TCE contaminated site on steeply dipping and faulted sandstone in California. Now, with collaborations involving several disciplines (analytical chemistry, mathematical modelling, geophysics, microbiology), the program includes three other sites contaminated with chlorinated solvents in addition to the California site: a Wisconsin site on flat-lying sandstone and two sites in Ontario on flat-lying dolostone. These four sites have important differences so that they are broadly representative of sedimentary rock but they have several aspects in common, including: much site data from earlier conventional investigations, contamination initially caused decades ago by DNAPL flow into the rock, sufficient matrix porosity (2-20 %) to allow diffusion-driven chemical mass transfer between fractures and the rock matrix causing strong influence on contaminant behaviour, deep contaminant occurrence (greater than 350 m below ground surface at one
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".