MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7097616947

39-tone MIL-STD-188-110A HF signal

2002· article· en· W7097616947 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicEngineering and Test Systems
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDemodulationTone (literature)SIGNAL (programming language)Frequency-hopping spread spectrumFrequency modulationDecoding methodsModulation (music)Software-defined radio
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Sa majeste ́ la reine, représentée par le ministre de la Défense nationale, 2002 A set of algorithms has been developed to demodulate and decode the 39 tone signal, which is prevalent in the High Frequency (HF) frequency band. This signal, based on the MIL-STD-188-110A Standard, is one of several different types generated by the AN/PRC-138 Harris radio. Defence R&D Canada (DRDC)- Ottawa has two of these radios. Our work focused on the 39 tone fixed frequency mode, although the 39 tone signal is also the underlying modulation used in the AN/PRC-138’s frequency hopping mode. Thus, the work described here will also be useful to anyone developing dehopping and demodulation algorithms for the AN/PRC-138 frequency hopping signal. The signals were captured by the Agilent Technologies Blackbird system in a laboratory setting. The objective of the task was to gain a detailed understanding of the sophisticated 39 tone signal and to develop software radio algorithms for demodulating and decoding the signal. The report describes the signal structure, the signal capture equipment, and the steps involved in demodulating and decoding the signal so that the

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score0.047

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0140.010

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.182
Teacher spread0.170 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicEngineering and Test SystemsFrench-language works237,207