MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7097664400

The occurrence of h6gbomite in high-grade metamorphic rocks*

2016· article· en· W7097664400 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological and Geochemical Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMetamorphic rockBiotiteIdeal (ethics)Phase (matter)IlmeniteSulfide
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract. H6gbomite has generally been considered to be a rare accessory phase in metamorphic rocks. While investi-gating high-grade peraluminous metamorphites in the Ben-son Mine District, Adirondack Mountains, New York and the Manitouwadge Massive Sulfide District, Ontario, Cana-da, we have found several h6gbomite occurrences and be-lieve that h6gbomite is more widespread in high-grade alu-ruinous rocks than previously recognized. At Benson Mine, an iron-rich h6gbomite (H6g) occurs with K-feldspar-mag-netite (Mt)-ilmenite (Ilm)-biotite-almandine (Alm)-silliman-ite (Sil)-quartz (Qz)-hercynite (Hc)-corundum (Cor)-rutile (Ru). At Manitouwadge, Fe-Zn h6gbomite is found with gedrite-eordierite-staurolite-hercynite-magnetite_+ quar z + ilmenite _+ futile + biotite + cassiterite. Because composi-tion varies with structure type, it is essential to deter-mine the structure of h6gbomite utilized in specific reac-tions. H6gbomite from Benson Mine has an 8H structure type, while that at Manitouwadge has a complex mixed structure. Both are more iron-rich than previously reported h6gbomites, and their composition can be approximated by the ideal formula FesAl16TiO3o(OH) z. Proposed reac-tions for 8H-h6gbomite are H6g = Ilm + Hc + Cor + V,

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.029
Threshold uncertainty score0.058

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.188
Teacher spread0.174 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicGeological and Geochemical Analysis→French-language works237,207→