MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7097690004

Atlantic Geology 227 Structural transect through Silurian turbidites of the Fredericton Belt southwest of Fredericton, New Brunswick: the role of the Fredericton Fault in late Iapetus convergence

2004· article· en· W7097690004 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological formations and processes
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTransectLineationFold (higher-order function)SillTrace fossilBedding
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Excavations along the 23 km stretch of the Longs Creek to Fredericton section of the new Trans-Canada Highway created new exposures affording a transect through part of the Fredericton Belt west of, and including, the Fredericton Fault. This transect lies entirely in the Burtts Corner beds of the Silurian Kingsclear Group, revealing a multi-deforma-tion history. Earliest structural elements in the turbidites include a slaty cleavage (S1) that is close to being bedding-parallel in most places. No F1 fold closures have been identifi ed, but small enclaves of inverted bedding imply that such structures exist but are of limited scale and restricted occurrence. The most conspicuous structures are upright to overturned, open to tight F2 folds with chevron profi les, a locally well-developed axial planar slaty cleavage (S2) and a related crenulation lineation on S1 (L12). These folds have curvilinear hinge-lines that show an increase in curvilinearity toward the Fredericton Fault, coincident with a tightening of the interlimb angle. Lineations related to layer-parallel slip during F2 fold generation remain constant implying the changing geometry is a consequence of changing bulk strain rather than fold interference. Post-F2 structures include a sparsely developed set of chevron folds with horizontal axial planes (F3) and a poorly developed axial planar slaty cleavage (S3). At least two sets of late kinks have also been noted. Systematic variations in style and form of the F2 folds suggest a relationship with the precursor to the Fredericton

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.104
Threshold uncertainty score0.210

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.195
Teacher spread0.186 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicGeological formations and processesFrench-language works237,207