Bibliographic record
Abstract
Reason for Policy 1.1 The University of Manitoba values the contributions of its students, staff and faculty in the community. The University of Manitoba is committed to delivering an exceptional student experience and ensuring our students have a variety of experiential education opportunities including, but not limited to, undergraduate research, community service learning, and international exchanges. 1.2 The reason for this policy is to provide formal recognition of student’s co-curricular activities through a Co-Curricular Record (CCR). The CCR is a formalized university-certified record of University-approved and facilitated activities that support student development in venues that are not for academic credit. The CCR will be available to students in addition to the academic transcript, as a clear statement of involvement in activities that support holistic student development. Part II Policy Content 2.1 Apart from a student’s academic learning, experiences in campus programs that are of a
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.009 | 0.028 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.009 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.012 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.006 |
| Research integrity | 0.018 | 0.014 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.340 | 0.250 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; the direct Gemma label and the distilled Codex classifier agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".