A microfiche edition of this publication may be purchased from:
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Scientific, technical, and interpretive publications written by staff of the Northern Forestry Centre during 1987-90 are listed alphabetically by author. A subject index is provided for the main entries. In addition there is an appendix listing reports prepared under the federal-provincial forestry development agree ments for Alberta, Saskatchewan, and Manitoba. RESUME Ce document enumere alphabetiquement (par auteur) les publications scien tifiques et techniques ainsi que les ouvrages de vulgarisation qui ont ete rediges par Ie personnel du Centre de foresterie du Nord ou pub lies par Ie Centre entre 1987 et 1990. Un index des sujets est presente pour les notices principales. on y trouve egalement a l'annexe une liste des rapports prepares dans Ie cadre des ententes federales-provinciales sur la mise en valeur des ressources forestieres signees avec l ' Alberta, la Saskatchewan et Ie Manitoba. iii iv PREFACE The Northern Forestry Centre has produced a wealth of forest research litera ture since it opened in 1970. Earlier general bibliographies cover research from the former Manitoba-Saskatchewan region prior to 1968 (Hildahl et al. 1968) and for
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.009 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.769 | 0.550 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; the direct Gemma label and the distilled Codex classifier agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".