“The Socioeconomic Effects of Economic Liberalization Revisited:
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study empirically investigates the theoretical doctrines of neo-liberal theory and examines the socioeconomic effects of the level of democratization. A cross-sectional time series analysis is performed on 102 countries from Latin America, Africa, Asia and Oceania using data from 1975 to 2003. The results indicate that neo-liberalism has a positive effect on economic growth, but no effect on improvements in health or education. Moreover, democracies are found to have no relation to economic development, but are associated with a more equitable distribution of non-economic resources. A case is made that modern democracies compensate for the shortcomings of neo-liberalism, and alternative forms of political organization are discussed. 3INTRODUCTION For the last quarter century, economic liberalization, or neo-liberalism, has been an influential model of development. By 1979, both the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund (IMF) had adopted the neo-liberal development philosophy (Corbo and Fischer 1992). With this endorsement by the international financial
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".