MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7097720172

Cataloger’s Desktop

2008· article· en· W7097720172 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicLibrary Science and Information Systems
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMetadataCatalogingDocumentationOrder (exchange)Resource (disambiguation)Property (philosophy)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The most widely used cataloging documentation resources in an integrated, online system—accessible anywhere. � Look up a rule in AACR2 and then quickly and easily consult the rule’s LC Rule Interpretation (LCRI). � Includes Describing Archives: A Content Standard. � Turn to dozens of cataloging publications and metadata resource links plus the complete MARC 21 documentation. � Find what you need quickly with the enhanced, simplified user interface. Free trial accounts & annual subscription prices: Visit www.loc.gov/cds/desktop For free trial, complete the order form at www.loc.gov/cds/desktop/OrderForm.html AACR2 is the joint property of the American Library Association, the Canadian Library Association, the Chartered Institute of Library and Information Professionals.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.016
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.882
Threshold uncertainty score0.169

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.016
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.001
Bibliometrics0.0070.011
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0100.009
Open science0.0020.003
Research integrity0.0030.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.8820.918

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.194
Teacher spread0.163 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicLibrary Science and Information SystemsFrench-language works237,207