PTC&B In vitro Microtuberisation in Potato Obtained from Diverse Sources
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Seventeen potato cultivars of six diverse sources have been evaluated for their response to in vitro microtuberisation in presence or absence of light. Tuber initiation appeared first in the light and gave higher number of microtubers with higher total as well as mean weight than the dark. Among the cultivars, on the average, Patrones performed best for most of the parameters such as, days to tuber initiation, number of tubers, their weight per plant and mean tuber weight. In terms of microtuber production potential, Chamak was the poorest. Among the different sources, the Dutch and Canadian cultivars showed comparatively better performance in respect of microtuber production potential than the others. The local high yielding varieties were the least productive. The weight of microtubers per tube (534.6 mg) and mean tuber weight (104.3 mg) were also significantly higher in the light compared to dark (264 mg/tube and 87.8 mg/tuber, respectively). Microtuberisation potential is a variety-dependent character, which is largely influenced by environmental factor.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".