Groux, Cohesion and Leadershix, 1 by Birren-Ground Caribou Response to Man-Made Barriers
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ABSTRACT. Barren-ground caribou Rangifer tarandus groenlandicus of the Kami-nuriak population on the Canadian mainland west of Hudson Bay make annual migrations of several hundred kilometres to and from their calving ground. A man-made barrier to corral caribou for marking and release failed because caribou would not leave the frozen water course at the entrance to the corral, nor would they readily deviate from learned travel routes. Some caribou delayed their migration northward until they found ways to circumvent the barrier. Other caribou overcame the man-made obstacle and continued on their set course. Any disruption of caribou movement could be detrimental to cow and calf survival because of increased dangers along new routes chosen and the delay of pregnant cows in reaching the calving grounds. RÉSUMÉ. Cohésion de groupe et réaction de leadership à des barrières artificielles chez le Caribou de la toundra. Sur la terre ferme à l'Ouest de la mer d'Hudson, les caribous de la toundra Rangifer tarandus groenlandicus du groupe de Kaminuriak effectuent des migrations annuelles de plusieurs centaines de kilomètres pour se rendre à leurs terrains de mise bas et pour en revenir. Une tentative de réunir les caribous au moyen d'une barrière artificielle pour les marquer et ensuite les relâcher, a échoué parce que les bêtes refusèrent de quitter leur trajectoire sur la rivière gelée à l'entrée du corral, comme elles refusent de dévier de leur route apprise. Certains caribous retardèrent leur migration vers le Nord jusqu'à ce qu'ils aient découvert des façons de contourner la barrière. D'autres surmontèrent l'obstacle et continuèrent leur route. Tout changement dans le mouvement du troupeau peut mettre en danger la survie des femelles et des veaux par les dangers accrus le long des nouvelles routes choisies et à cause du retard encouru par les femelles pleines à se rendre sur leurs terrains de mise bas.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".