Infant Sleep Position Placing infants to sleep on their backs reduces the risk of
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Sudden Infant Death Syndrome (SIDS) – one of the leading causes of death to infants. 46 In Oregon, SIDS is the number one cause of death to older infants (between 28 days and up to 1 year), accounting for nearly 30 percent of all deaths in this age group during 2002-2004. 47 The American Academy of Pediatrics recommends that healthy infants younger than 6 months of age be placed to sleep on their back. 48 • In 2004, Oregon mothers were significantly more likely than other U.S. 49 mothers to place their infants to sleep on their backs – 74.7 versus 65.1 percent, respectively. Furthermore, Oregon achieved the Healthy People 2010 target of having at least 70 percent of infants put to sleep on their backs. • Although Oregon mothers were more likely to place their infants to sleep on their backs than any other position, more than a quarter (25.3 percent) of Oregon infants were put to sleep in the higher risk
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".