Status, roles, and the sense of mattering
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ABSTRACT: Individuals with a sense of mattering perceive they are acknowledged and relevant in the lives of other people. Using data from a representative sample of adults age eighteen to fty-ve from Toronto, Can-ada, who are employed in the paid labor force, we examine the effects of sta-tuses, roles, and occupational conditions on mattering. Being female, having children, and holding jobs with more autonomy, complexity, fulllment, and supervision duties enriches the conviction of mattering. Relationship and parental strains are related negatively to mattering, which conceals the positive effects of spousal-partner and parental roles. Results show gender-contingent effects: women in our sample derive greater benets for matter-ing from education, but they also are affected more negatively by work-to-home conict. Conversely, in our ndings, men gain more from having children and being involved in a relationship, but they are also affected more negatively by relationship strains. Other results show that the posi-tive relationship of age with job autonomy and complexity suppresses its
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".