The Parties and the Nature of the Claim
Bibliographic record
Abstract
h or responsibility for the children. G went to Canada after the separation and W had sole care of the children. W brought an action for compensation in the Equity Jurisdiction of the Supreme Court. This is a jurisdiction that has the discretion to fill gaps in the common law and statute by providing remedies that recognise deeds done in good faith, even when there is no formal legal right to be enforced. In this case, W convinced Hodgson J of the necessary elements to a cause of action called `promissory estoppel' -- a promise that G should not be allowed to walk away from. The Judge found the necessary elements of that cause of action were proven: G had promised to accept the role of a parent in a financial way; relying on G's promise, W had decided to have the children; G had known or intended that W would do so on the basis of that promise; W has and will suffer detriment in that she is now faced with the expensive and onerous task of raising the children alone; and G should now
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.007 | 0.021 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.007 | 0.008 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.014 | 0.007 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.006 |
| Research integrity | 0.030 | 0.015 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.044 | 0.011 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".