THE PUBLIC HEALTH EFFECTS OF ABANDONED COAL MINE WORKINGS ON RESIDENTS IN SOUTH WELLINGTON, NANAIMO
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The direct public health effects of organic compounds and metals associated with drinking water are unclear, especially as only a small fraction of the daily intake of elements reaches the human body1. However, surveys by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) have “confirmed the presence of several organic petroleum and solvent types of compounds in drinking water effected by mine operations”2. Among these pollutants are “suspect carcinogens ” 3. Previous studies have shown that in coal mining areas, the quality of groundwater decreases with depth. There is an extensive network of abandoned coal mines in South Wellington, and several domestic wells have been drilled directly into these mines or coal seams. In August 2002 the Ministry of Water Land and Air Protection calculated the quality of well water in the Cassidy observation well in Nanaimo. In this analytical report, substances in the well such as sulphur and iron were shown at levels exceeding the recommended drinking water quality guidelines. I am currently researching the potential positive and negative impacts of abandoned coal mine workings on the health of residents in South Wellington, Nanaimo. This project will compare the health of two groups, a study group drinking well water, and a control group drinking the city’s mains water. The major objective of the data analysis will be to determine which specific illnesses are more common in the study area and in the control area. The direct public health effects of organic compounds and metals associated with drinking water are unclear, especially as only a small fraction of the daily intake of elements
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".