References 1. Canadian Task Force on the Periodic Health Examination. The Canadian
Bibliographic record
Abstract
system. Our collective concern with health has become obsessional.4-11 Phrases used to describe this attitude in-clude: “death-denying culture,”6 “an unhealthy obsession with health,”7 “tyranny of health,”8 “coercive healthism,”9 “war on death”10 and “cultural imperialism.”11 Meador states that the search for disease may lead to the elimina-tion of wellness,5 while Barsky points out that, even though our health has improved immeasurably over the last few decades, our subjective conception of being well has diminished.4 Adding yet another screening program to the many already in existence will surely aggravate this problem. The World Health Organization defines health as “physical, mental and social well-being, not merely the ab-sence of disease and infirmity.”12 There is no proof that screening the adult population for diabetes will improve well-being, but the process of doing so will almost certainly diminish it.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".