MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7097853167

YUKON EXPLORATION AND GEOLOGY 2002 149 Geology of the Dezadeash Range and adjacent northern Coast Mountains (115A), southwestern Yukon: Re-examination of a terrane boundary

2015· article· en· W7097853167 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological and Geochemical Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTerraneMetamorphic rockPetrographyProterozoicPaleozoicPlutonRange (aeronautics)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Granodiorite of the Coast Plutonic Complex intruded metasedimentary rocks in the Dezadeash Range of the northern Coast Belt in the late Mesozoic. Graphitic staurolite–biotite schist, associated with the Kluane Metamorphic Assemblage, underlies the western Dezadeash Range, whereas cordierite–biotite gneiss, previously correlated with the Late Proterozoic – Paleozoic Nisling Assemblage, is exposed in the eastern and southern regions. A terrane boundary was placed in the central Dezadeash Range. Recent petrographic studies reveal a southeastward increase in metamorphic grade. Prograde appearance of cordierite partly obliterated an older schistosity and caused a fabric change near the postulated terrane boundary. Furthermore, typical continental margin rocks, such as marble and quartzite, are not observed. This suggests that all metamorphic rocks in the Dezadeash Range can be correlated with the Kluane Metamorphic Assemblage, whereas Nisling Assemblage rocks occur in the Coast Mountains to the east. Therefore, the terrane boundary is located in the Dezadeash River valley, further southeast than previously thought. RÉSUMÉ

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.652
Threshold uncertainty score0.692

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.204
Teacher spread0.174 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicGeological and Geochemical Analysis→French-language works237,207→