MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7097858506

Canada A Distributed Drag Force Approach for the Numerical Simulation of Urban Flows

2004· article· en· W7097858506 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicWind and Air Flow Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDragTurbulenceMomentum (technical analysis)DissipationComputer simulationDrag coefficientSink (geography)Wind speed
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Sa majeste " la reine, represented par le ministre de la Defense nationale, 2004 A modified k-e model is proposed for the simulation of the mean wind speed and turbulence for a neutrally-stratified flow through and over a building array, where groups of buildings in the array are aggregated and treated as a porous barrier. This model is based on time averaging the spatially-averaged Navier-Stokes equation, in which the effects of the obstacle-atmosphere interaction are included through the introduction of a volumetric momentum sink (representing drag on the unresolved buildings in the array). In addition, closure of the time-averaged, spatially-averaged Navier-Stokes equations requires two additional prog-nostic equations, namely one for the time-averaged sub-filter kinetic energy, 7c, and another for the dissipation rate, e, of 7c. The transport equation for 7c can be derived from first principles and explicitly includes additional sources and sinks that arise from time aver-aging the product of the spatially-averaged velocity fluctuations and the distributed drag force fluctuations. The latter time-averaged product can be approximated systematically to any degree of accuracy using a Taylor series expansion and, to this end, a high-order

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.964
Threshold uncertainty score0.071

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.207
Teacher spread0.197 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicWind and Air Flow StudiesFrench-language works237,207