CASE REPORT Cerebral microsporidiosis u B
Bibliographic record
Abstract
it an us s, h y mm ive any antiretroviral therapy. The HBs Ag was negative. He was started on AZT Loignon et al. AIDS Research and Therapy 2014, 11:20 http://www.aidsrestherapy.com/content/11/1/20continued until February 3, 2003. His immune statusl’université de Montréal (CHUM), Montréal, Canada Full list of author information is available at the end of the articleAt admission, he was afebrile and his physical examin-ation was unremarkable except for right hemi paresis and left homonymous hemianopsia. His complete blood count (CBC), liver function tests and routine biochem-istry were within normal limits. The CD4+ count was 300/3TC 150 mg (Combivir®) BID and lopinavir 200/ ritonavir 50 mg (Kaletra®) 2 tablets BID. The HIV viral load was not performed (for technical reasons) before initiating antiretroviral therapy, but after two weeks it was 2 279 (3.36 log10) HIV-1 RNA copies/ml. Because of clinical deterioration, dexamethasone was initiated on
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.006 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".