MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7097886171

CHRONIC TUNNEL INFECTIONS IN CHILDREN: REMOVAL AND REPLACEMENT OF THE CONTINUOUS AMBULATORY PERITONEAL DIALYSIS CATHETER IN A SINGLE OPERATION

2015· article· en· W7097886171 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicCentral Venous Catheters and Hemodialysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCatheterCuffPeritoneal dialysisAmbulatoryHemodialysisContinuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysisDialysis
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

.Objective: Chronic tunnel infections often necessitate the removal of the continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) catheter. Most published studies advocate postponing the insertion of a new catheter for several weeks. For young children it will be particularly difficult to wait this length of time, since vascular access may be cumbersome, and hemodialysis may not be well tolerated. The present study describes the results of the simul-taneous removal and replacement of the CAPD catheter..Design: Twenty-three Toronto Western Hospital II catheters were inserted in 17 children because of infectious complications (21 chronic tunnel infections; 2 recurrent peritonitis) in a single operation under appropriate antibiotic prophylaxis. The new catheter was inserted at the contralateral side of the abdomen with the deep cuff in the midline, using the same entrance to the peritoneal cavity. Dialysis was resumed immediately after the operation..Setting: A university pediatric dialysis unit..Patients: Seventeen

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.306
Teacher spread0.277 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicCentral Venous Catheters and Hemodialysis→French-language works237,207→