Bertoldi: “Major Households Appliances in New Member States and Candidate Countries: looking for energy savings
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Commission, through its Joint Research Centre (JRC) has focused a number of its activities on electricity end uses including domestic appliances. Better equipment efficiency is the fastest and most cost-effective response to limiting growing demand for electricity and to reduce CO2 emissions. Every unit of energy saved on electricity corresponds to about 3 units of primary energy avoided. And all of these are part of every day life and level of comfort. [1] The status of the electricity end-use consumption is well known for the EU-15, but there is still a lack of information about New Member States (NMS) and Candidate Countries (CC). NMS-10 together with Romania and Bulgaria that is possible to join EU in 2007 represents around a quarter of the population and existing households from EU-15.The household electricity consumption is mainly due to appliances and lighting and in these countries the saving potential is much greater than in the EU-15. The aim of the paper is to show the status of electricity consumption for main appliances and to try to identify the saving potential for these in New Member States and Candidate Countries.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it