MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7097896604

Volume 50 2008 CANADIAN BIOSYSTEMS ENGINEERING 3.1 Safe storage guidelines for rye

2014· article· en· W7097896604 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicSeed Germination and Physiology
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMoistureWater contentVolume (thermodynamics)PenicilliumMoldGermination
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

guidelines for rye. Canadian Biosystems Engineering/Le génie des biosystèmes au Canada 50: 3.1-3.8. Safe storage guidelines for grains at different moisture contents and storage temperatures are essential to know how long seed can be held without deterioration. Rye samples with 10.0, 12.5, 15.0, and 17.5 % moisture content (wet basis) were stored at 10, 20, 30, and 40oC for 16 weeks. Germination, moisture content, visible and invisible microflora, and free fatty acid (FFA) values were monitored periodically. Germination rate decreased significantly with increase in moisture content, temperature, and storage period (α=0.05). Moisture content of the samples stored at 10oC increased with time, whereas that of samples stored at 30 and 40oC decreased. Visible mold appeared in all the 17.5 % moisture samples and in all the samples stored at 40oC. Penicillium spp. and Aspergillus glaucus group were the predominant fungi in almost all samples throughout the study. Fat Acidity Value (FAV) increased with

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.405
Threshold uncertainty score0.815

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0040.003
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0030.002
Research integrity0.0030.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0610.028

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.240
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSeed Germination and PhysiologyFrench-language works237,207