Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
document shows the formatting requirements for UBC theses. Theses must follow these guidelines in order to be accepted at the Faculty of Graduate Studies for publication in the UBC Library and in Library and Archives Canada. Please use this document to review your thesis formatting, as it will alert you to some common errors and omissions. This document uses the term "thesis " to mean either a thesis or a doctoral dissertation. The formatting requirements are the same for both. IMPORTANT! You do not have to use the same font, chapter numbering and general style of this training document for your thesis. Please consult with your program and follow a style guide for your discipline. Font size for text should be 10- 12 point if you are using Arial or Times New Roman. If you are using another font, please ensure that it is no smaller than these two examples. The idea for this guide came from the work of Penny Simpson, Assistant for Theses, SFU Library. Many thanks! Review Your Thesis or Dissertation May 2010Avoid using scientific symbols or Greek letters in your title; spell out the words. Must be lower case.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.005 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it