104 Canadian Journal of Counselling/Revue canadienne de counseling/1996, Vol. 30:2
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Job sharing is an alternative form of employment which may often be overlooked by the average worker. Apart from the negative consequences of receiving half the salary of a full-time position, what are some of the benefits enjoyed by people who job share? Eightwomen were interviewed for this qualitative research study. Rather than simply allowing more time for them to spend with their children or on domestic chores, job sharing provided them with some unanticipated opportunities to enjoy a richer quality of life. Résumé Ln travail à temps partagé est une alternative d'emploi qui est souvent oubliée par le travailleur. Autre que les conséquences négatives de ne recevoir que la moitié d'un salaire d'un travail à temps plein, quels sont les bénéfices dont profitent les gens à temps partagé? Huit femmes ont été interviewées pour cette étude qualitative. Plutôt que de leur permettre de passer plus de temps avec leurs enfants ou à des tâches domestiques, les employées à temps partagé ont découverts des opportunités inattendues leur permettant ainsi de jouir d'une qualité de vie plus riche.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.011 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.012 | 0.008 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.006 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.080 | 0.008 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".