MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7097960028

Carex sychnocephala many-headed sedge Status: State Sensitive

2012· article· en· W7097960028 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicBotany, Ecology, and Taxonomy Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBractAcheneReceptacleCyperaceaeCarexOvoid
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

tufted, without creeping rhizomes. Culms slender, 2 to 20 inches tall aphyllopodic. Leaves flat or nearly so, <1/16 to 1/8 inch wide, few but well scattered, the upper often surpassing the culms. Spikes several gynaecandrous, sessile, closely crowded in a dense, ellipsoid or ovoid head 2/3 to 1 inch long, light green or greenish-stramineous in aspect. Bracts sheathless, one or more of the lower ones much enlarged and foliaceous, 3 to 8 inches long, the spikes thus appearing to be surrounded and much surpassed by the leaves. Pistillate scales pale or colorless and largely hyaline-scarious except for the firmer midrib, commonly accuminate or shortly awn tipped, shorter than the perigynia and often largely concealed among them. Perigynia pale greenish or stramineous, very slender, mostly 1/8 to inch long and <1/16 inch wide, 5 to 7 times as long as wide, planoconvex, several-nerved dorsally, few-nerved ventrally, with an elongate, narrow, strongly serrulate, bidentate beak. Stigmas 2. Achenes lenticular, 1/16 inch long and <1/16 inch wide. Identification Tips: The bracts at the base of the heads are long and foliaceous (3 to 8 inches), much longer than the heads, giving this sedge a distinctive appearance. Phenology: Flowers June through August. Range: Occurs from British Columbia to Ontario, southward to

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.015
Threshold uncertainty score0.051

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0150.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.231
Teacher spread0.197 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicBotany, Ecology, and Taxonomy StudiesFrench-language works237,207