Bibliographic record
Abstract
Our itinerary begins in the courtyard of the Château Frontenac, with a focus on the former role of this site as a centre of colonial power, French then British (The Château Saint-Louis, the Château Haldimand and Governor Montmagny’s Cross of Malta). We will then make our way to Saint Louis Street, passing by the Maillou house and the Kent house, where the surrender of Quebec City was signed in 1759 (two rare examples of French regime buildings). We will see the Jacquet house, the Ursuline Convent, and view the Price building on our way toward Parliament Hill via the Ursuline Lane, where we will see the Thompson and MacGrady houses. On d’Auteuil Street, with its houses constructed in the British terrace tradition, we will view bronze busts on display in Poets ’ Alley and have a brief presentation of the fortification system, as seen from within the walls, including a powder magazine and the Saint Louis Gate. We will also briefly discuss commemorative efforts in the city as we walk by monuments dedicated to the Boer War, the Quebec Conferences and Gandhi. Passing through a postern gate we will be able to appreciate the thickness of the city wall and the method by which the fortifications were constructed. We will then arrive in National Assembly Square, where we will discuss the design concept of this public space and the role of the National Capital Commission of Quebec in its creation. Architects responsible of the restauration of the Jacques-Cartier tower will present
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.843 | 0.744 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; the direct Gemma label and the distilled Codex classifier agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".