MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7098013535

Acquisitions et services bibliographiques

2014· article· en· W7098013535 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicInformation Retrieval and Search Behavior
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsQuery languageGovernment (linguistics)Information systemOrder (exchange)Query optimizationControl (management)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The author has granted a nonexclusive licence allowing the National Lïbrary of Canada to reproduce, loan, distriiute or sell copies of this thesis in microfom, paper or electronic formats. The author retains ownership of the copyright in this thesis. Neither the thesis nor substantial extracts fiom it may be printed or othewise reproduced without the author's permission. L'auteur a accordé une licence non exclusive permettant à la Biblbthèque nationale du Canada de reproduire, prêter, distribuer ou vendre des copies de cette thèse sous la forme de microfiche/film, de reproduction sur papier ou sur format électranique. L'auteur conserve la propriété du droit d'auteur qui protège cette thèse. Ni la thése ni des extraits substantiels de celle-ci ne doivent être imprim6s ou aumement reproduits sans son autorisation. A Graph-oriented Query Language for Semi-Structured Data: Theoreticai and Practical Analysis This study examines the theoretical foundations and the practical aspects of the graph-oriented query language for the semi-structured data (SSD) proposed in wS99]. SSD is a data model that is designed for heterogeneous data sources. It allows for information integration and information sharing over the Intemet. Several query languages for the SSD model have been proposed but none has been standardized yet. This paper analyzes the graph-oriented query language proposal, and suggests ways in which it can be Mer improved to fit the SSD model. First and foremost, 1 would Like to thank rny supervisor, Professor Goste Grahne, for taking me on as a mident about two years ago, even though he knew little about me. He has been a role mode1 to me in his dedication and professionalism-My choice of career has been greatly influenced by Mr Grahne and I hope that 1

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.014
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.307
Threshold uncertainty score0.437

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.014
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0140.033
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0210.008
Open science0.0030.005
Research integrity0.0030.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.6930.683

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.267
Teacher spread0.259 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; the direct Gemma label and the distilled Codex classifier agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicInformation Retrieval and Search BehaviorFrench-language works237,207