Ground-based Near-Infrared Observations of Venus Night Side: Near-Infrared 0
Bibliographic record
Abstract
new-infrared emission the Venus 100 km) is and variable. Spectroscopic observations acquired in 1975 indicated day and emission rates and 1.2 (1 MR 1012 photons cm 2 s - 47r The intensities arc puzzling they indicate that more than half of the atomic oxygen that is produced through of on day side of Venus must recombine to produce 0 2 in excited state. Existing laboratory indicate that this should quantum efficiencies no larger a More observations reveal intensities as as dramatic spatial and temporal variations High (0.3 cm - ) spectra of Venus side with Canada France Hawaii Telescope Spectrometer (a greater than 1 arc common and indicate rotational of K in emitting layer. Spectral cubes taken with the Anglo-Australian Imaging and Canada Hawaii 1991, 1993, and 1994 a more complete of spatial and variability in this emission. Images extracted at wavelengths within Q-branch (1 .269 show contrasts larger than 10 to 1 across the side. disk-averaged intensity is comparable to seen in...
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".