THE EFFECT OF VITAMIN BI DEFICIENCY AND OF RESTRICTED FOOD INTAKE ON THE RESPONSE OF MICE TO THE LANSING STRAIN OF POLIOMYELITIS VIRUS*
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Little is known concerning the relation of diet to the incidence or progress of poliomyelitis in human beings or in experimental animals. Before Armstrong (2) had produced the disease experimentally in the cotton rat and mouse, Woolpert and Harrison (3) had attempted to infect rats, mice, and guinea pigs on a diet low in vitamins B and C with the virus of this disease. They did not succeed in reproducing any of the symptoms characteristic of poliomyelitis. Several investigators, on the other hand, have claimed that the resistance of human beings and monkeys to the virus of poliomyelitis is decreased by a deficiency of some of the vitamins. McCormick (4) has reported that in Canada the diets of victims of infantile paralysis are frequently low in vitamin B1 and that he obtained good results in paralytic eases by administering rather large amounts of thiamine. Ward and associates (5), however, found that in seven eases of human poliomyelitis the excretion of vitamin BI in the urine was within normal limits. Jungeblut (6), working with monkeys, has presented evidence to indicate that the incidence of paralysis could be reduced by
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".