MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7098070457

Current Account Sustainability in Seven Developed Countries

2015· article· en· W7098070457 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicFiscal Policies and Political Economy
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCurrent accountSustainabilityCapital accountCreditorExternal debtBalance of paymentsDebtDeveloped countryDeveloping countryInterest rate
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract. This paper is an attempt to examine the G-7 sustainability properties of current accounts of seven developed countries, using a methodology based on fractional processes. The purpose of this study is to test for the sustainability of current account deficits in seven developed countries for the 1974:1-2001:3 period. The results indicate that all countries ’ current account is covariance non-stationary and three countries ’ (France, Italy and Canada) current accounts are mean reverting so that they are sustainable in the long run, while those of Germany, UK, US and Japan are not mean reverting and are unsustainable. These results should also signal a warning to creditors and policymakers, unless there are policy distortions or permanent productivity shocks to the domestic economies. Furthermore, persistent deficits may lead to increased domestic interest rates to attract foreign capital and, in addition to this, the accumulation of external debt owing to persistent deficits will imply increasing interest payments that impose an excess burden on future generations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.038
Threshold uncertainty score0.076

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0040.005
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.054
GPT teacher head0.280
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicFiscal Policies and Political EconomyFrench-language works237,207