MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7098103848

Population Change and Lifecourse: Strategic Knowledge Cluster

2006· article· en· W7098103848 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicInsurance, Mortality, Demography, Risk Management
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPopulationPerspective (graphical)PacePopulation growthContext (archaeology)Social policyDemographic changeCluster (spacecraft)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Population issues provide an important part of the context within which significant social policy choices are made. Canada is experiencing low fertility, profound changes in family life, slow population growth largely driven by immigration, population aging, and important regional differences in the pace of both population growth and population aging. While the significance of demography is widely acknowledged, understanding of the determinants and consequences of demographic change for individuals and communities is limited. The objective of this proposal is to bring the fruits of demographic and social research to the forefront of discussion of social policy by bringing a demographic perspective into contact with a lifecourse perspective on individual and social change. The lifecourse perspective allows researchers, policymakers, and other stakeholders to see how broad changes in the make-up of our population affect the key decisions that individuals make and the transitions they experience in life. This focus on transitions promises to enrich social policy debate and open the door to innovations that will more effectively address new social challenges faced by individuals and communities. To accomplish this, we propose to bring together two accomplished research clusters that had previously received SSHRC support. The Population Change and Public Policy cluster will join with a group of

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.008
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.010
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.048
Threshold uncertainty score0.095

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0080.010
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0050.008
Science and technology studies0.0050.006
Scholarly communication0.0100.009
Open science0.0020.012
Research integrity0.0030.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.059
GPT teacher head0.326
Teacher spread0.267 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicInsurance, Mortality, Demography, Risk ManagementFrench-language works237,207