MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7098104079

Chemical and Physical Characteristics of Wood Smoke in the Northeastern US during July 2002 Impacts from

2014· article· en· W7098104079 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicFire effects on ecosystems
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSmokeSampling (signal processing)Atmosphere (unit)Event (particle physics)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

During early July 2002, dense smoke from a number of large forest fires in central Quebec Province was transported south by prevailing winds into the New England and Mid-Atlantic states. Given the high concentrations of smoke, strong flows from the north, and relative absence of other emissions in that direction, this event provides a unique opportunity to evaluate impacts of nearly pure wood smoke at multiple monitoring sites in the Northeast. Continuous measurements of PM2.5 mass from State and Federal monitoring programs and light scattering from (a few) IMPROVE nephelometers and (many) ASOS forward scatter meters reveal highly complex spatial and temporal patterns of smoke impacts at the surface on July 6-8, 2002. Maximum observed 24-hour smoke impacts at most US surface sites occurred on July 7th, which was coincidently a routine filter sampling day for the IMPROVE, STN and FRM (fine mass-only) networks. Combining the continuous PM, light scattering and filter-based chemical data provides insights into the chemical and physical features of the smoke during this “event of opportunity”.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.262
Threshold uncertainty score0.522

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.190
Teacher spread0.185 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicFire effects on ecosystems→French-language works237,207→