MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7098151167

PETERSENITE-(Ce), A NEW MINERAL FROM MONT SAINT.HILAIRE, AND ITS STRUCTURAL RELATIONSHIP TO OTHER REE CARBONATES

2015· article· en· W7098151167 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicCrystal Structures and Properties
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMineralSupercellCrystal structureRefractionCarbonateOrientation (vector space)Single crystal
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Petersenite-(Ce) is a newly discovered rare-earth-element carbonate from the Poudrette Quarry, Mont Saint-Hilaire, Quebec. It is grey, with a slight pink tint, forming striated prisms up to 7 mm in length, It has a vitreous luster and is translucent o transpaxent. Pete$enite-(Ce) is relatively soft (Mohs hardness-3) and very brittle, having a conchoidal fracture. Optical properties are biaxial, with moderate dispersion, no absorption, and indices of refraction a 1.623(1), B 1.636(1), y 1.649(l),2V**. = 89.7(5) ' and2V"6". = 89.8o, and an optical orientation of X = b,Y lt c = 30o and Z = a.Electron' microprobeanalysesgaveNa2O 17.38,CaO 1.32,BaO 0.32,SrO 1.70,La2O3 14.49,CqO323.66,Pt2O3 2.00,Nd2O35.82, Sm2O3 0.60 and CO2 (from crystal-structure analysis) 32.92, total 100.21 wt.Vo, which yields the empirical formula O{4.riCuo.rrtcto.qel4ssN4.z:Sro.rrPro.orSmo.rBto.or)(CO:): or, idea[y, Naa(REE12(CO) sfor Z = 4, with D",1. = 3.67 Elcm3 and Dr*. =3.69 glcm3, Crystal-structure analysis shows the mineral to be monoclinic, space group?r, with a20.872(4), b_6.367(l), c 10.601_(2) A and B120.50(3f. The sffongest 1ines iltle X-ray powder pattern [d in A(O(&&DI are 9.13(3)(201,001), s.e6)Orr,ur,2or,40D,4.l3(3X501,301),3.70(q(412,012),2.607(10)(402,802,420),2.148(3X814,014) aad l.92l])(432,032,430). The crystal structure has the subcell of burbankite and remondite-(Ce), but the supercell changes the ratio of [8]-coordinated to [10]-coordinated cations. The layered structure is compared to that of other REE carbonates.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.776
Threshold uncertainty score0.989

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.044
GPT teacher head0.251
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicCrystal Structures and PropertiesFrench-language works237,207