APPROVED BY RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD AT ITS MEETING OF
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Is the person to whom other directors appointed under Section 9 of the Bank of Canada Act may turn for guidance in respect of issues in connection with Board business. Presides over any meeting of directors appointed under Section 9 of the Bank of Canada Act where the Governor or Senior Deputy Governor are not present. Is responsible for providing leadership to enhance Board effectiveness. Leads the process (which is established by the Corporate Governance Committee) for the Board’s annual self-evaluation. Is responsible, for supporting the Governor in the management of the Board and the Bank=s corporate governance practices as established by the Corporate Governance Committee pursuant to its terms of reference. Is responsible for acting as liaison between the Board and management on matters of governance. On authorization by the Board, acts as a spokesperson for the directors appointed under Section 9 of the Bank of Canada Act. Works with the Chairperson of the Human Resources and Compensation Committee to ensure the regular review of the performance of the Governor and Senior Deputy Governor against established duties and objectives. Works with the Chairperson of the Corporate Governance Committee and the Governor on the annual review of the composition of committees for recommendation to the Corporate Governance Committee and the Board. Shall receive notice of, and may attend any of the meetings of the committees of the Board.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.011 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.355 | 0.217 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; the direct Gemma label and the distilled Codex classifier agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".