Community Psychiatry Depression Screening Day: A Mental
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract: The Canadian Psychiatric Association has been a leading promoter of public awareness campaigns in the field of mental illness. In 1992, the CPA developed Mental Illness Awareness Week (MIAW), an annual public educa-tion event designed to raise awareness of the issues sur-rounding mental illness. In 2002, over 20 public events were held across the country from St. John’s Newfound-land to Medicine Hat, Alberta. The authors report on the organization and the findings of one event, a Depression Screening Day held in Montreal, Quebec, and discuss the benefits of university–hospital–community collaboration in developing new events for the 2003 MIAW. Résumé: Journée de dépistage de la dépression: un projet de la Semaine de sensibilisation aux maladies mentales L’Association des psychiatres du Canada (APC) a été l’un des principaux promoteurs des campagnes de sensibilisation du public dans le domaine de la maladie mentale. En 1992, l’APC a mis sur pied la Semaine de sensibilisation aux maladies mentales (SSMM), une campagne annuelle d’éducation du public destinée à sensibiliser davantage les gens aux enjeux entourant la maladie mentale. En 2002, plus de 20 activités publiques se sont déroulées dans tout le pays, de St. John’s, Terre-Neuve, à Medicine Hat, Alberta. Les auteurs rendent comptent de l’organisation et des résultats d’une activité, une Journée de dépistage de la dépression, tenue à Montréal, Québec, et discutent des avantages de la col-laboration entre l’université, l’hôpital et la communauté dans l’élaboration de nouvelles activités pour la SSMM
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.020 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".