Adding hierarchical task networks to ConGolog
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this paper we extend the high level execution language ConGolog (developed at the University of Toronto) by adding to it a new construct which we call the htn-construct. The new construct improves ConGolog by allowing easy specification of non-determinism when a partial ordering between a set of actions needs to be maintained. Furthermore, it allows temporal constraints to be specified easily. We present an implementation of the htn-construct in PROLOG which can be directly added to PROLOG implementations of ConGolog interpreters. Abstract id: A365; Word count: 5600 Keywords: planning, robotics, knowledge representation, temporal reasoning 1 Introduction Golog [ Levesque et al. 1997 ] and ConGolog [ De Giacomo et al. 1997 ] are two main high level execution languages developed recently (in the 90's) by the Cognitive Robotics group at the University of Toronto. The approach to write programs in these languages for high level control of robots and other agents in a dynamic and inc...
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".