Bibliographic record
Abstract
logging road. The presence of mineralization was discovered by Efrem and Lucia Specogna while engaged in a prospec tors ' assistance project during 1976. Reconnaissance stream silt sampling followed by float (examination led to the discovery of three new and significant mineral deposits in this one area. Work in 1980 included trenching, extensive sampling, geological mapping, and drilling. Six core holes totalling approximately 399 metres were drilled on the mineralized zone shown on Figure 313. Because of the Specognas ' work in the Nanaimo Lakes area, the geology of the area has been reviewed and revised. Only preliminary results will be given here. Good exposures of crinoidal limestone and marble with thinly banded grey chert can be easily traced alorlg the length of the east side of the valley. These members of probable Sicker Group are variable in thicknelrs and the chert is particularly lenticular. They overlie deformed basaltic volcanic and sedimentary rocks of undetermined age and are in turn gradational to or unconformably overlain by remnants of;2 formerly more extensive rhyolite tuff unit. The limestones have well-developed karst topography charact~~ized by craterlike sinkholes, dolines, and small caverns. The Sicker sedimentary units dip gently eastward and are unconformably overlain by undulating or gently dipping Nanaimo Group sandstone, siltstons. and conglomerate.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.713 | 0.438 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; the direct Gemma label and the distilled Codex classifier agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".