MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7098281827

Hubble Space Telescope Imagery and Canada-France-Hawaii Telescope Fabry-Perot Two-dimensional Spectroscopy in H-alpha of the Ejected Nebula M1-67: Turbulent Status

2001· article· en· W7098281827 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicBioactive Natural Diterpenoids Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNebulaProper motionStarsPopulationLine (geometry)SpectroscopyTelescopeHubble space telescope
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Bright circumstellar nebulae around massive stars are potentially useful to derive time-dependent mass-loss rates and hence constrain the evolution of the central stars. A key case in this context is the relatively young ejection-type nebula M1-67 around the runaway Population I Wolf-Rayet star WR124 (= 209 BAC), which exhibits a WN8 spectrum. With HST-WFPC2 we have obtained a deep, H image of M1-67. This image shows a wealth of complex detail which was briey presented previously by Grosdidier et al. (1998). With the interferometer of the Universite Laval (Quebec, Canada), we have obtained complementary Fabry-Perot H data using CFHT MOS/SIS. From these data M1-67 appears more-or-less as a spherical (or elliptical, with the major axis along the line of sight), thick, shell seen almost exactly along its direction of rapid spatial motion away from the observer in the ISM. However, a simple thick shell by itself would not explain the observed multiple radial velocities along the line of sight. This velocity dispersion leads one to consider M1-67 as a thick accelerating shell. Given the extreme perturbations of the velocity eld in M1-67, it is virtually impossible to measure any systematic impact of the present WR (or previous LBV) wind on the nebular structure. The irregular nature of the velocity eld is likely due to either large variations in the density distribution of the ambient ISM, or large variations in the central star mass-loss history. In addition, either from the density eld or the velocity eld, we nd no clear evidence for a bipolar outow, as was claimed in other studies. On the deep H image we have performed continuous wavelet transforms to isolate stochastic structures of dierent characteristic size and look for scaling laws. Smallscale wavelet co...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.181
Threshold uncertainty score0.359

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0230.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.251
Teacher spread0.245 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicBioactive Natural Diterpenoids ResearchFrench-language works237,207