SOGC Policy Statement Statement on Generic Oral Contraceptives The Society
Bibliographic record
Abstract
of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Can-ada welcomes the increased choice available to women provided by the introduction of generic oral contraceptives into Canada. Health Canada has approved new generic oral contraceptives as bioequivalent to currently available brand name formulations, providing increased choice and less expensive options to many Canadian women in need of contraception. To qualify as bioequivalent to existing brand name formula-tions, new generic oral contraceptives are required to meet a standard of 80 % to 125 % blood equivalence.1 At this time, generic formulations have no Pearl Index rating, the accepted standard for evaluating the effectiveness of a con-traceptive method.2 Health care practitioners will continue to prescribe oral contraceptives to best meet their patients ’ needs, determin-
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.023 | 0.047 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.008 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.006 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.062 | 0.017 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.058 | 0.040 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".