Bibliographic record
Abstract
According to J. P. Guilford, creativity "represents an area in which psycho logists generally, whether they be angels or not, have feared to tread (1950, p. 444). " A survey of the literature for the past twenty-five years reveals a dearth of material having a definite bearing on creativity. Yet at the present time creativity is in the forefront of psychological research. The research has centered generally on three areas- nature, nurture, and evalu ation. In all three areas creativity has proved to be an elusive concept, diffi cult to recognize, define, and measure validly. The recognition of the concept of creativity as a dimension capable of assessment brought the realization of the lack of creative individuals in the present society. The individual who dared to be different was ostracized by society. He stood anywhere on the scale from a misfit to a madman, basic ally because of the outmoded belief that when the creative individual acts against the given norm he is mentally unbalanced (Barron, 1958). Some research studies have arrived at the view that the creative indi
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".